A little admiration of how easy UI customization is on Firefox, and how shitty Chromium looks.

  • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Personally I find it far more important that it’s not run by a company that will try its hardest to track your every movement on the web, but to each their own, I suppose.

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah yes the trust worthy browser without tracking that comes with Google search by befault. lol

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I am also pretty sure Firefox is equally if not more secure than Chromium. They just got some really bad reputation for not sandboxing everything.

      • Para_lyzed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only issue they have with sandboxing is on Android, as they have yet to implement per-site process isolation despite it being present on desktop Firefox and Chromium Android for many years now. I’ve been tracking the development of Project Fission on Android (Firefox’s per-site process isolation) for years now and it still isn’t even ready for testing. Additionally, Firefox Android does not use Android’s isolatedProcess flag for sandboxing, which is another area in which it is behind Chrome. For that reason, I cannot recommend Firefox on Android, and instead recommend Cromite (fork of Bromite after its development was abandoned) which is based on Chromium.

        • ferralcat@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Firefox shipped sandboxing on Android years ago (before chrome) and then removed it. I’m not sure you gain much from it on Android. It eats up ram making performance crap on cheap phones and apps already run in their own app user context to isolate what they can access.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You never tried to listen for stock Firefox’s traffic with Wireshark for sure.

      People speak very good thing about Firefox but they like to hide and avoid the shady stuff. Let me give you the un-cesored version of what Firefox really is. Firefox is better than most, no double there, but at the same time they do have some shady finances and they also do stuff like adding unique IDs to each installation.

      Firefox does is a LOT of calling home. Just fire Wireshark alongside it and see how much calling home and even calling 3rd parties it does. From basic ocsp requests to calling Firefox servers and a 3rd party company that does analytics they do it all, even after disabling most stuff in Settings and config like the OP did.

      I know other browsers do it as well, except for Ungoogled and because of that I’m sticking with it. I would like to avoid programs that need no snitch whenever I open them. ungoogled-chromium + ublock origin + decentraleyes + clearurls and a few others.

      Now you’re free to go ahead and downvote this post as much as you would like. I’m sorry for the trouble and mental break down I may have caused by the sudden realization that Firefox isn’t as good and private after all.

      • abbenm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Firefox is better than most, no double there, but at the same time they do have some shady finances

        So I went ahead and read that article and goodness gracious, does anybody actually read these links??? Because that link is a complete nothingburger. It’s a blog post from someone who never read a 990 before (standard nonprofit disclosure form) who thinks every other line of is proof of a scandal. But it’s not, it’s just a big word salad that is too long to read, so nobody will bother.

        The most significant charge is (1) that the CEO makes too much and (2) the author doesn’t like that they contract out work to consultants who think diversity is good. Every point made, so far as I can tell:

        • Have assets worth $1.1 billion as of 2021
        • Mozilla spent less on “expenses” from 2021 relative to 2020
        • Revenue went up over the same time
        • A lot of revenue was from royalties (e.g. agreements for default search)
        • They disagree with the wording on a donate form about whether Mozilla “relies” on individual donations
        • The CEO made $5.6MM
        • They pulled out one expense, which appears to have been training/education relating to social justice topics
        • They pull out a few more individual expenses and weren’t sure what they were.

        This isn’t secret documents being handed to Deep Throat in a dark parking lot. There’s no smoking gun, no smoke, just a PDF with ordinary tables of expenses and revenue, and consultants who did diversity training. If that’s shady then, get ready to be mad about every non-profit ever.

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s a blog post from someone who never read a 990 before (standard nonprofit disclosure form) who thinks every other line of is proof of a scandal.

          Only in the USA a “non profits” turns profit. 😂

          • abbenm@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Pretty sure all non-profits strive to be cash flow positive, in the United States and otherwise.

      • ferralcat@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I will never understand how people expect software to gather no telemetry or metrics whatsoever.

        • root@precious.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          We did fine without it for a very long time. We still do with a lot of software. It’s called voluntarily submitting a bug report and/or core dump.

          • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            If you ask a user to show you a “core dump” they’re more likely to shit on their floor and send you a photo than do what you actually mean.

            Telemetry is absolutely crucial in determining what to focus on in development, to fix issues the users might not even realize exist. Especially for projects that aim at the general public. As long as it’s communicated clearly, used truly only for development purposes and an opt-out is available there’s nothing wrong about it.

            • root@precious.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You don’t use the technical term, but you do ask.

              I’m not against telemetry, I’m against making it hundreds of different hidden options.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I actually started using Firefox in my early teens just because I liked the look of the Ui and themes better than Chrome.

    I’ve also recently switched to Librewolf ;)

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Or just use multiple browsers? If one size fits all for you then good for you but there is no Firefox based browser that can replace Vivaldi for me. So I use both, one for my power user needs and other for private browsing (hardened Firefox, normal FF isn’t great for privacy either)

    • stuckgum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      When I was running it every other website would break, switched over to Mullvad Browser instead.

      • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Mullvad Browser is the same but worse.

        If you have websites break without noscript, you visit some really shady websites.

        Be happy they break and dont claim the browser.

        For my websites nearly never cause problems, and if they do Firefox tells me that they want to read my canvas data, send push ads and more, so its obvious.

        • auth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you have websites break without noscript, you visit some really shady websites.

          not necessarily shady… probably designed specifically for Chrome.

            • auth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Google, for example, did many demo websites that only worked on chrome in the past… I’ve also seen government website that only worked in Chrome… but unfortunately I don’t keep a list. A company I worked at in the past also had a training website that only worked in Chrome (I’m not revealing this one though…).

              Edit: Just stumbled on this website: http://Thai5sushibar.com … not sure if it’s my extensions, but it doesn’t load in Firefox and loads in Chrome. Good rainbow rolls.

              • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Uhm that site has no https and redirects somewhere else, dont feel like enabling javascript for that one.

                And Ublock blocks it too. So yeah not a positive example

                • auth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I just came about it today… but still, it works in Chrome and not Firefox. I have seen many others in the past though.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a joke right? There is not a single feature it could have that weights against the fact that its still Chromium-spyware.

      • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        As opposed to your data being mined by Google or sold by Mozilla? Dude you’re cracking me up.

        • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Mozilla literally doesn’t do that. If you’re concerned about them lying about it you can compile the browser yourself.

            • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I can packet inspect and watch them sell data? No lol they collect telemetry but you can use a derivative that doesn’t because it’s open source. That’s not the point though, the point is they don’t sell data. You can look at the finances yourself https://stateof.mozilla.org/

              • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Hmm guess they’re running a charity then. Your tracking is not data? I guess you and I have different definitions of what data is. Sure, you can lock it down if you really want. But so can every other browser.

    • Zacryon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s objectively worse than Firefox. For example, Firefox recently passed all minimum security requirements by the German Federal Office for Information Security. No other browser meets them.