![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
A new preferences dialog has been added to Software Manager that has, among other options, a toggle to show unverified Flatpaks — but the distro makes clear this is “not recommended”
A new preferences dialog has been added to Software Manager that has, among other options, a toggle to show unverified Flatpaks — but the distro makes clear this is “not recommended”
Technically, this numbering scheme conforms with semantic versioning where
1.9.0 -> 1.10.0 -> 1.11.0
Ahhhh why not anything in /tmp
or better ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}
or best mktemp
Sadly still no c/tombstoning for this post
Same here lol, just read through ext{2…4} as well as Btrfs and Bcachefs (and B Trees of course). What a wonderful unplanned deep dive.
So should ext3 be deprecated for the same reason? Seems it also has the 2038 problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext3
E: Seams -> Seems
Wow, 1993 to 2024, not a bad first-class support lifetime.
I was going to say, I doubt your pet tabby is killing any California condors at any appreciable rate.
Amazing how easy it is to bias people with data though.
You could at least put the command in a spoiler or add a /s to make sure some random new user doesn’t follow the advice
Not regular Fedora, though, it was only in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 41, so very very early, bleeding edge distributions. Nothing that a regular Fedora user would be using.
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2024-3094
E: and Fedora 40 beta which some regular users could conceivably be using
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/urgent-security-alert-fedora-41-and-rawhide-users
You guys still use math? The most I get to do is centering a picture in PowerPoint
(Thankfully I will soon be going to do real work but man was that a weird little diversion)