AggressivelyPassive

  • 1 Post
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle
  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlMath
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Maybe you were just at a bad school? Quadratic equations are mandatory in Germany even for the lowest level of graduation.

    Until my Abitur (12th grade) I learned about equations, stochastics, integrals and derivatives, vector stuff, etc.


  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlMath
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    That’s software development for you. Why is that weird value there? Because some guy, at some point, had checked for that and somehow it’s still relevant.

    I know of a system that churns through literally millions of transactions representing millions of Euros every day, and their interface has load bearing typos (because Germans in the 90s were really bad at the Englishs).


  • If you actually want to learn maths (that is, if you’re not just venting), you could try to ask for help in dedicated math or teaching communities.

    The problem with teaching stuff you know, is to put yourself in a position of actually not knowing anything. I’m a software developer and had to teach some apprentices a few years ago, and it was really eye opening to me to see how much assumptions about the apprentice’s knowledge I made even though I thought I made my explanation “basic”.

    It’s quite possible that all the tutorials you’ve read are either for literal children, so they just don’t work for your adult brain, or they’re intended for adults and assume too much.

    On a personal note: how did you get into that situation? Were you home schooled?




  • I mean this subtitle right here gave me a pretty good idea what’s this initiative is all about already, but that’s just me I guess

    But what does that mean exactly? Fairphones with long support duration? Solar powered software developers?

    I get a rough direction from that, but nothing else, but it’s a headline, that’s ok.

    What really bugs me is that the body of the text doesn’t really explain it either, but needs hundreds of words for that. It’s just fluff for a press statement that should have fit into a tweet.

    Also, keep in mind that people from different countries work on KDE, and English is not their first language, I don’t know what are your expectations… on how the writing should be…

    Well, given that I’m from Germany and English is not my first language, and also given that I’m neither very good at it nor do I have a PR team, I would expect writing at least on my level, I guess?

    But here’s the thing, take a look at Google or MS posts about sustainably and being green, and you’ll realize, truly realize how one could say so much without saying anything… this wall of text that you’re talking about is full of insights

    And these companies are the benchmark? I mean, can’t we expect more from a nonprofit? There are some insights, yes, but they’re drowning in the wall of text.

    Just as an insight for you: a news article is supposed to increase in detail level from top to bottom. The headline shows the rough topic, subtitle slightly expands on that, the first paragraphs tell the actual story, the next paragraphs provide more and more context. The idea is, that a reader can stop reading if she feels like there’s been enough context.

    Look at the article here and ask yourself if it fits this description.


  • Why would I not say that?

    Clearly they can’t get their point across. And I don’t know, why people down vote me for that.

    KDE starts a new initiative, and does so by creating a giant wall of text that says very little about the initiative itself. So little in fact, that people here obviously don’t understand what they’re actually trying to do. That is bad communication. Simple as that. And given that this is not a random blog post, but a press statement, I’m pretty sure a bunch of people read it before publishing it.














  • Ok, now I have to assume you’re trolling.

    Look at my comments above, that they’re not the first is exactly my point. They re-invent things instead of investing a tenth of the effort in the existing solution and their solutions are worse.

    And please don’t come with that corporate apologetics. You make it seem like a corporation never makes any errors whatsoever and even the stupidest error isn’t just stupidity, but corporate genius we mere mortals just don’t understand. That’s not the case. Canonical simply is not very good at this.

    Yes, maybe they do have some products that do work and are actually better than the competition, but again, actually read my comments and you’ll see that I already covered that.

    Seriously, are you paid by them?